People Over Profit: Why the Social Pillar of ESG Determines Long-Term Sustainability

Sustainability is often discussed in terms of profits, carbon footprints, and compliance metrics. Yet, at its core, sustainability is about people. The social aspect of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) frameworks and the people dimension of the Triple Bottom Line, remains the most decisive factor in determining whether organizations endure uncertainty, crises and change. For companies, organizations and state corporations alike, people are not just stakeholders; they are the system itself. Employees, customers, suppliers, communities, regulators and shareholders form an interconnected web where trust, once broken, creates ripple effects that can outlast any financial loss.

The Triple Bottom Line approach urges organizations to measure success beyond financial performance, incorporating people, planet and profit. While environmental stewardship and profitability are critical, history consistently shows that neglecting the people aspect undermines both. Human capital is arguably the most significant asset any organization holds. It embodies the “S” in ESG, this includes: workplace conditions, fairness, inclusion, dignity, safety and societal impact. When organizations commit to people, they lay the foundation for resilience, legitimacy and longevity.

One of the most cited examples of people-first decision-making is the 1982 Johnson & Johnson Tylenol crisis. In that year, Tylenol capsules were found to have been laced with cyanide, leading to the tragic deaths of seven people, including a 12-year-old child. The incident triggered widespread panic, amplified by intense media coverage, given Tylenol’s position as a trusted and widely used product.

Notably, it was a media professional who first contacted Johnson & Johnson to alert the company and confirm the allegations. What followed became a benchmark for crisis management rooted in social responsibility. Johnson & Johnson swiftly established a seven-member strategy team tasked with two immediate priorities:

  1. Protecting people, and
  2. Preserving trust in the product and the company.

The company recalled all Tylenol capsules distributed nationwide, over 31 million bottles, despite the massive financial loss running into millions of dollars. Equally important, Johnson & Johnson used the same media platforms driving public fear to transparently communicate the risks, warn consumers, and reassure the public that decisive action was being taken. In the short term, profits suffered. In the long term, trust was strengthened. Tylenol regained market leadership, and Johnson & Johnson’s reputation for ethical leadership endures decades later. The lesson was clear that placing people over profit is not a sacrifice but an investment.

When organizations demonstrate genuine care for people, whether, employees, customers, or communities, they create a ripple effect of trust. This trust translates into loyalty, confidence, advocacy, and ultimately financial sustainability. This principle was powerfully articulated by investment expert Ivo Knoepfel in the 2004 United Nations Global Compact report, “Who Cares Wins.” The report argued that ESG factors should be integrated into financial analysis because they help identify risks, evaluate long-term business impact, and drive positive change. This thinking laid the foundation for responsible and sustainable investing as we know it today.

Today’s employees are more socially conscious and values-driven than ever before. Beyond compensation, they are concerned with: Safe and fair working conditions, pay parity and equity, inclusion, diversity, and a sense of belonging, mental health and overall well-being and whether their work is meaningful, ethical, and impactful. Organizations that fail to address these concerns face disengagement, attrition, reputational damage and eventually declining performance. Those that succeed attract committed talent and build cultures capable of navigating uncertainty.

In East Africa, the social dimension of sustainability resonates deeply with cultural values. The region is inherently community-oriented, grounded in the philosophy of Utu, the belief that one’s humanity is tied to the humanity of others. Customers actively refer businesses that treat them with dignity and fairness. Organizations that give back to their communities foster goodwill, legitimacy, and long-term relationships. Corporate success is not viewed in isolation but as something intertwined with community well-being.

The social pillar of ESG is not a soft or secondary consideration, it is a strategic imperative. History, culture, and modern business realities all point to the same conclusion: organizations that prioritize people build trust, resilience, and enduring value. In times of certainty and crisis alike, people-first organizations do not merely survive; they lead. And in doing so, they prove that profit, when anchored in social responsibility, is not diminished, but sustained.

Recent Posts

People Over Profit: Why the Social Pillar of ESG Determines Long-Term Sustainability

Sustainability is often discussed in terms of profits, carbon footprints, and compliance metrics. Yet, at its core, sustainability is about people. The social aspect of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) frameworks and the people dimension of the Triple Bottom Line, remains the most decisive factor in determining whether organizations endure uncertainty, crises and change. For companies, organizations and state corporations alike, people are not just stakeholders; they are the system itself. Employees, customers, suppliers, communities, regulators and shareholders form an interconnected web where trust, once broken, creates ripple effects that can outlast any financial loss.

The Digital Dictum: Freedom of Expression versus The Power to Censor

The interplay between statutory regulation and constitutional freedoms has become the primary battleground for Kenyan practitioners. My recent research into the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act (CMCA) 2025, further enriched by insights from the Professional Law Institute (PLI) webinar featuring Hon. Justice (Dr.) Smokin Wanjala of the Supreme Court of Kenya and Linus Kaikai (Advocate of the High Court), reveals a shifting landscape where the bench must now balance enforcement with the sanctity of the Bill of Rights.

THE INDISPENSABILITY OF BOARD EVALUATION FOR SUSTAINABLE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board evaluation is essential to sustainable corporate governance because it ensures that boards remain effective, accountable, and responsive to changing institutional and stakeholder demands. Many governance failures do not occur suddenly but develop over time when boards become passive, fail to question management or lose clarity in their oversight role. Board evaluation comes in handy to provide a structured way to assess how well boards perform their duties, clarify the boundary between governance and management and identify areas for improvement. By promoting reflection, accountability, and continuous improvement, board evaluation strengthens decision-making, builds stakeholder trust and supports the long-term stability and resilience of institutions.
WEB DEVELOPMENT | WEB DESIGN

LETS DO IT

This website uses cookies to enhance performance and ensure you have a good experience on our website. Cookies used are found here