Strengthening Governance in Kenya’s Tea sector 

Strengthening Governance in Kenya’s Tea sector

Article by Wachilonga Namasaka

Tea has long been at the heartbeat of Kenya’s agriculture landscape. Visitors in Kenya are more likely to be welcomed by a steaming cup of tea as a gesture of hospitality found in homes and offices alike. Recognizing this significance of tea in the country, Executive order No. 3 of 2021 on Agricultural reforms: Revitalization of the tea sub-sector highlighted that Kenya has been for the longest time the leading exporter of black tea accounting for nearly 20% of the global exports. Additionally it stated that tea is Kenya’s third largest foreign exchange and it provides a livelihood of over 620,000 smallholder farmers and supports over six million people.

Strengthening Governance in Kenya’s Tea sector

Despite this significant contribution of tea to the country’s economic growth, the order recognized that the smallholder tea farmers have not been able to realize their profits in full due to various governance challenges in Kenya Tea Development Agency (KTDA) subsidiaries. Furthermore, the executive order noted that Kenya’s tea pricing process lacks transparency and inclusivity compared to other countries. A directive was thus given to the Tea Board of Kenya alongside other stakeholders to develop tea subsector (corporate governance guidelines/regulations on directorship) to majorly setup limits for directors involved in the Tea value chain. 

Strengthening Governance in Kenya’s Tea sector

Despite this directive, there appears to be a challenge in the actualization of general corporate governance guidelines that can help solve the problems that currently face the tea sector. To achieve this, TBK can learn from how other sectors such as the Capital Markets Authority (CMA) and Institute of Certified Secretaries (ICS) came up with their corporate governance guidelines in their specific sectors. 

The CMA has established corporate governance code for Issuance of Securities to the public where it calls for governance standards that exceed the minimum requirements set in the Companies Act. Similarly, ICS emphasizes capacity building of different organizations such as ESG frameworks to ensure adherence to sound corporate governance practices. By collaborating with these sectors, TBK can also develop effective corporate governance guidelines that will support profitability for both small and large-scale tea farmers.

Strengthening Governance in Kenya’s Tea sector

The guidelines can also mandate the boards of smallholder tea factories to undergo an annual governance audit to evaluate whether the company is in compliance with robust sound practices. Such an audit can be conducted by an accredited governance audit institution and a report offered to TBK. TBK can then proceed to evaluate the levels of compliance and know how it can promote best practices and standards in various operations in the tea sector in line with section 5 the Tea Act no.3 of 2020.

In a significant step toward transparency, the IEBC held elections for smallholder tea factories across the country in June 2024. The newly elected leaders now have an opportunity to advocate for the implementation of a comprehensive governance code tailored to the tea sector. Such guidelines would embody the principles of Article 10(2) of the Constitution which promotes national values like good governance, integrity, transparency, and accountability.

Article was originally published in the Business Daily

Strengthening Governance in Kenya’s Tea sector

Recent Posts

Reflections from the Zambia Arbitration Week – The Two Percent Problem: Enforcing Dispute Board Decisions

In construction dispute resolution circles, one statistic is repeated so frequently that it has almost become a mantra. Dispute boards resolve approximately 98% of the disputes referred to them. It is an impressive figure and understandably so. The number features prominently in conference presentations, training materials, and advocacy for the dispute board model. But the remaining 2% deserves attention.

Rule 5 (2) (b) Applications and the Constitutional Threshold for Appeals to the Supreme Court under Article 163 (4) (a): A Commentary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Roseline Orimba Onduo v Maurice Otieno Ochola [KESC]

Article 163 (4) (a) permits appeals to the Supreme Court as of right only in cases involving the interpretation and application of the Constitution. Yet, the content of that threshold is often misunderstood, despite the Supreme Court settling it in previous cases. Equally contested is whether interlocutory orders under Rule 5 (2) (b) of the Court of Appeal Rules can warrant an appeal to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, once again, settled the law on these issues. This commentary answers these questions together with other pertinent issues in appellate litigation; such as the nature of negative orders and why they cannot be stayed.

The New Era of Government-Owned Enterprises in Kenya: Governance Reform and the Expanding Role of Certified Secretaries

Kenya has entered a defining moment in the governance of its public commercial institutions with the enactment of the Government Owned Enterprises Act. The Act represents one of the most significant structural reforms in the management of state-owned commercial entities in recent history. The Act presents a governance reset. It shifts Government-Owned Enterprises (GOEs) from traditional bureaucratic state corporation models into commercially prudent public companies governed under the Companies Act.
WEB DEVELOPMENT | WEB DESIGN

LETS DO IT

This website uses cookies to enhance performance and ensure you have a good experience on our website. Cookies used are found here