Exploring New Horizons: Insights from the 1st Annual SDRC Research Colloquium 2024

Grateful for the opportunity to present my research on the impact of procedural rules on Kenya's Court Annexed Mediation Programme at the 1st Annual SDRC Research Colloquium 2024. It was an inspiring event that underscored the vital role of academia in shaping the future of dispute resolution. Excited to see how our collective insights will drive meaningful reforms in ADR.

Article by Dr Ken Mutuma assisted by Becky Kibagendi

Research Colloquium

This pioneering event brought together scholars, practitioners, and thought leaders to discuss pressing issues in the realm of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), focusing on innovative research and practical applications. I had the privilege of presenting my paper, “Assessment of the Impact of Court Procedural Rules in the Implementation of the Court Annexed Mediation Programme (CAMP) in Kenya.” This research critically examined how institutional rules and procedures shape the efficacy of the CAMP—itself a significant initiative aimed at alleviating congestion in Kenyan courts by encouraging mediation as a viable alternative to litigation.

The session was enlightening, drawing on insightful critiques and perspectives from fellow academics and practitioners. We delved into the challenges posed by procedural rules and their implications for accessibility and fairness in mediation processes. One of the core revelations was the importance of aligning procedural frameworks with the goals of mediation, ensuring that they do not inadvertently stifle participation or the effectiveness of dispute resolution. Moreover, the colloquium underscored the essential role academia plays in the evolution of ADR. As we emphasize evidence-based research and interdisciplinary collaboration, scholars can facilitate the collection of data, analysis of trends, and the synthesis of best practices within ADR frameworks. The insights fostered in academic circles are essential for informing policymakers and practitioners, ultimately shaping the future landscape of dispute resolution in Kenya and beyond.

The panel discussions also highlighted the global shift towards mediation and other alternative mechanisms as legitimate strategies for resolving conflicts outside traditional judicial settings. Participants reflected on the need for ongoing research, policy development, and training for legal professionals to enhance their mediation skills and understand the nuances of procedural rules that can affect outcomes.

The 1st Annual SDRC Research Colloquium was more than just an academic event; it was a celebration of knowledge-sharing and a rallying call for all stakeholders in dispute resolution. I am excited to see how our collective efforts can foster a more efficient and equitable system for dispute resolution in Kenya as we continue to advocate for reforms grounded in robust academic research.

Recent Posts

Reflections from the Zambia Arbitration Week – The Two Percent Problem: Enforcing Dispute Board Decisions

In construction dispute resolution circles, one statistic is repeated so frequently that it has almost become a mantra. Dispute boards resolve approximately 98% of the disputes referred to them. It is an impressive figure and understandably so. The number features prominently in conference presentations, training materials, and advocacy for the dispute board model. But the remaining 2% deserves attention.

Rule 5 (2) (b) Applications and the Constitutional Threshold for Appeals to the Supreme Court under Article 163 (4) (a): A Commentary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Roseline Orimba Onduo v Maurice Otieno Ochola [KESC]

Article 163 (4) (a) permits appeals to the Supreme Court as of right only in cases involving the interpretation and application of the Constitution. Yet, the content of that threshold is often misunderstood, despite the Supreme Court settling it in previous cases. Equally contested is whether interlocutory orders under Rule 5 (2) (b) of the Court of Appeal Rules can warrant an appeal to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, once again, settled the law on these issues. This commentary answers these questions together with other pertinent issues in appellate litigation; such as the nature of negative orders and why they cannot be stayed.

The New Era of Government-Owned Enterprises in Kenya: Governance Reform and the Expanding Role of Certified Secretaries

Kenya has entered a defining moment in the governance of its public commercial institutions with the enactment of the Government Owned Enterprises Act. The Act represents one of the most significant structural reforms in the management of state-owned commercial entities in recent history. The Act presents a governance reset. It shifts Government-Owned Enterprises (GOEs) from traditional bureaucratic state corporation models into commercially prudent public companies governed under the Companies Act.
WEB DEVELOPMENT | WEB DESIGN

LETS DO IT

This website uses cookies to enhance performance and ensure you have a good experience on our website. Cookies used are found here