Arbitration as a Tool for Achieving Green Growth and Sustainability in Kenya’s Energy and Construction Sector

Arbitration plays a critical role as Kenya advances its development agenda under Vision 2030 and fulfills its climate commitments under the Paris Agreement.

By Prof. Kenneth Wyne & Buke Halkano

Arbitration plays a critical role as Kenya advances its development agenda under Vision 2030 and fulfills its climate commitments under the Paris Agreement. These industries are not only key contributors to Kenya’s GDP, which is estimated at USD 131.67 billion, but are also closely tied to the achievement of several United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. These include clean energy, sustainable cities, climate action, and infrastructure innovation. By providing a flexible, efficient, and neutral mechanism for resolving disputes, mediation helps de-risk investments and foster long-term sustainability in these critical sectors.

While these sectors hold enormous promise, they also face growing scrutiny due to their environmental and social impacts. Large-scale energy and construction projects often encounter complex challenges related to land use, environmental degradation, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder engagement. These challenges can give rise to disputes that require resolution frameworks that are efficient, fair, and responsive to sustainability concerns. In this context, dispute resolution is increasingly being recognized as a vital mechanism. It not only resolves disputes but also supports the enforcement of environmental and governance standards in infrastructure development.

Arbitration offers confidentiality, procedural flexibility, and the ability to appoint expert panels. These features make it well suited for resolving disputes that involve technical issues and environmental considerations. A notable example is a major dam project in which construction defects, including micro-fissures and sedimentation problems, led to significant ecological damage. The dispute was resolved through arbitration, and the process highlighted the importance of integrating environmental awareness and technical expertise into the proceedings. This case demonstrated how arbitration can address not just contractual and technical claims, but also the broader sustainability and community impacts of infrastructure projects.

Kenya’s arbitration framework is built on solid international legal foundations. The country has adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law and is a signatory to the New York Convention. These instruments ensure that arbitral awards are enforceable in over 170 countries. This legal architecture offers investors confidence that their rights will be protected and that climate-aligned contractual commitments will be honored. Additionally, Kenya is a contracting member of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. This allows for the resolution of disputes involving foreign investors in public-private partnerships, particularly in renewable energy and infrastructure development.

At the global level, frameworks such as the Paris Agreement, the ICC Arbitration Rules, and the Greener Arbitrations Campaign are shaping modern practices in dispute resolution. These tools promote the inclusion of climate commitments and sustainability benchmarks within contract terms and arbitration procedures. As a result, arbitration is increasingly reflecting environmental stewardship and long-term social responsibility, alongside commercial efficiency.

Despite this progress, several challenges remain. There is still limited awareness among stakeholders, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises, about arbitration’s potential to manage environmental, social, and governance risks. The cost and complexity of arbitration can act as barriers, and there is a need for more arbitrators who possess expertise in areas such as environmental law, engineering, and sustainability. Addressing these gaps will require targeted reforms, including professional training, institutional capacity building, and the creation of green arbitration protocols that are tailored to Kenya’s development context.

As Kenya continues to position itself as a regional hub for sustainable development, arbitration should be seen not only as a dispute resolution tool but also as a mechanism for advancing accountability, transparency, and climate resilience. By embedding environmental and social principles into every stage of the arbitration process, Kenya’s legal and investment communities can strengthen the country’s path toward inclusive and sustainable growth. Ultimately, arbitration is more than a legal mechanism. When aligned with green development goals, it becomes a governance strategy that supports Kenya’s vision of environmental justice, economic stability, and prosperity for future generations.

Please also read on Driving Sustainable Change: The Role of ESG Frameworks in Shaping Kenya’s Corporate Responsibility and Future

Arbitration as a Tool for Achieving Green Growth and Sustainability in Kenya’s Energy and Construction Sector

Recent Posts

People Over Profit: Why the Social Pillar of ESG Determines Long-Term Sustainability

Sustainability is often discussed in terms of profits, carbon footprints, and compliance metrics. Yet, at its core, sustainability is about people. The social aspect of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) frameworks and the people dimension of the Triple Bottom Line, remains the most decisive factor in determining whether organizations endure uncertainty, crises and change. For companies, organizations and state corporations alike, people are not just stakeholders; they are the system itself. Employees, customers, suppliers, communities, regulators and shareholders form an interconnected web where trust, once broken, creates ripple effects that can outlast any financial loss.

The Digital Dictum: Freedom of Expression versus The Power to Censor

The interplay between statutory regulation and constitutional freedoms has become the primary battleground for Kenyan practitioners. My recent research into the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act (CMCA) 2025, further enriched by insights from the Professional Law Institute (PLI) webinar featuring Hon. Justice (Dr.) Smokin Wanjala of the Supreme Court of Kenya and Linus Kaikai (Advocate of the High Court), reveals a shifting landscape where the bench must now balance enforcement with the sanctity of the Bill of Rights.

THE INDISPENSABILITY OF BOARD EVALUATION FOR SUSTAINABLE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board evaluation is essential to sustainable corporate governance because it ensures that boards remain effective, accountable, and responsive to changing institutional and stakeholder demands. Many governance failures do not occur suddenly but develop over time when boards become passive, fail to question management or lose clarity in their oversight role. Board evaluation comes in handy to provide a structured way to assess how well boards perform their duties, clarify the boundary between governance and management and identify areas for improvement. By promoting reflection, accountability, and continuous improvement, board evaluation strengthens decision-making, builds stakeholder trust and supports the long-term stability and resilience of institutions.
WEB DEVELOPMENT | WEB DESIGN

LETS DO IT

This website uses cookies to enhance performance and ensure you have a good experience on our website. Cookies used are found here